On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Charlie Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That doesn't instantiate them, which is much harder in general. > > Say a Type has only one consructor, which takes an object of > class A. Now you have to instantiate A. But maybe A ony has > a constructor requiring a B... :-) > > Hopefully, the OP doesn't want to solve the most general case, > but has some specific limits he has not told us about yet.
In any case like this you create a contract that such classes must have a specific constructor. It is madness not to. -- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
