On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Jon Harrop <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 January 2009 22:05:23 Alan McGovern wrote: > > Taking a slightly more detailed view tells us a few more interesting > > things. Compare mono 2.0 (windows) to mono 2.0 (opensuse). The exact same > > version of mono ranges between 1.5x faster on linux (LU arrays) to 1.5x > > slower on linux (SPARSE). What this tells us is that there appears to be > > differences in the platform itself which make a difference > > performance-wise. > > I don't understand how a tight numerical loop could have such different > performance characteristics between platforms?! > > Mono features a lot of platform specific optimizations. Windows is not one were many of them have been implemented.
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
