On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jiří Zárevúcký <[email protected]> wrote: >> qt4dotnet is a slightly modified Qt Jambi compiled using ikvm > > Problem 1: It's a Java code running in Java VM which is running on Mono. > > I don't know, how does IKVM performs in the terms of performance or > memory usage, so correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that utterly > ineffective?
Not at all. I haven't made any formal performance comparisons but you can't notice any difference between a Qt C# app and a QtJambi app (time to load, speed, responsiveness, and even memory consumption, this is talking about Microsoft's .NET; mono still has some unresolved issues throwing exceptions that make it slower). But since you mentioned it I should make some formal tests comparing between them and see how "ineffective" this approach is. Regardless of it the simple fact that you can get .NET bindings for the whole Qt 4 stack in 5 minutes I think is a huge plus in "effectiveness". > > Just a side note: It's no longer called Trolltech. :) I know. I know.. So many years calling it Trolltech it is just an automatic thing for me to call it Trolltech's Qt4 > ______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
