Martín, sorry for the duplicate. Was an idiot and hit the wrong reply button, oops.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:19:01 +0200 Martín Vales <[email protected]> wrote: > waf have support for c# in windows and linux: > http://code.google.com/p/waf/ Hrm. Following the example, it claims to not know how to process C# files. Oops. The other options aren't really viable to me for various reasons (rant because it depends on Ruby, and msbuild/xbuild because that's single-purpose, really). > I think the best way to work with c# is use monodevelop or visual > studio, but it´s only my opinion. Eh, I am not much of a GUI guy. Well, that, and this software has to build in an automated, repeatable environment used for packaging, which requires a simple (from the packaging program's perspective), predictable build system. waf would be nice, but it doesn't seem to work. Perhaps I'll just go ahead and use plain Makefiles. Building on Windows isn't a requirement for me, so not having a sane 'make' on Windows doesn't matter to me. --- Mike -- <odd>.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and rewrote the kernel to be a microkernel using a special message-passing version of Visual Basic. --- Linus Torvalds, 2005
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
