Please tell me how to do that without having to register somewhere else (again). I already registerred to post this idea here...
Thank you! Jonathan Pobst wrote: > > Hey, > > This sounds like a pretty good idea. Please file an Enhancement bug on > MoMA in Bugzilla, and I'll try to add it for 2.6. > > "File MoMA bugs" link here: http://www.mono-project.com/MoMA > > Thanks! > Jonathan > > > galaktor wrote: >> At the http://www.mono-project.com/Command_Line_MoMA MoMA description >> it >> says "This is helpful for people who wish to add MoMA scans to their >> automated builds". I was quite excited about this feature and then as I >> tried it the first time I noticed that the tool itself does not give any >> feedback whatsoever. >> >> There is no error when errors were found. I would at least have expected >> to >> have a list of return codes to react to, for example: >> >> 0: nothing found, everything is fine >> 1: anything occurred >> 2. Mono-TODOs were found >> 3. NotImplementedException found >> ... >> >> But instead, I would have to integrate the generated HTML into my reports >> on >> the build server and manually check if there were any errors. There is no >> way for the build tool (in my case NAnt and CCNET) to notice that >> everything >> is fine. >> >> So where is the actual point in using MoMA for continous integration? The >> return codes would be so easy to implement and would really have value. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MoMA---Automatic-builds-tp24338721p24438739.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
