Michael -- Thanks, I suspect you're right. I have forwarded your note to Liquid's developers in the hope that they'll recognize the value in having their support library be compatible with Mono!
-- Bob You said: > Considering that there's some sort of license validation embedded in > the Liquid XML runtime, it's pretty likely that they've also > obfuscated the assembly. Some obfuscators use particular IL patterns > that are invalid according to the CLI spec, but are "overlooked" by > .NET dues to limitations in its IL validation. They're essentially > exploiting .NET bugs in order to confuse decompilers. The downside is > that assemblies that have been obfuscated using these techniques > usually don't work on Mono, which doesn't have the same > bugs/limitations -- and they might not even work on future versions of > .NET. > > Of course, I could be wrong... it might be a Mono bug. > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
