Sebastien Pouliot-2 wrote: > > > The field was left empty because it was not required for verifying the > authenticode integrity. In fact it's not commonly checked afaik. Is this > causing you a problem somewhere ? > > In this case patches would be welcome :-) Otherwise please open a bug > report (as an enhancement) on bugzilla.novell.com so I don't forget > about this issue next time I go around fixing those parts. > >
In our case, it was a check done to make sure the executable hadn't been damaged or corrupted in transport. That code was not sophisticated enough to understand a signature. I'm not sure this can fairly be categorized as an enhancement request. The Mono tool leaves the checksum invalid and the corresponding Microsoft tools correct the checksum (or zero it, I actually didn't specifically check which). Zero is a perfectly valid PE checksum value, and it indicates that no checksum is present. Having the Mono tool zero the checksum would solve my issue. DS -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Bug-in-signcode--%28Corrupts-PE-checksum%29-tp26325662p26351942.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
