With this working I could definitely convince my whole team to install monodevelop just for the decompiler. Is their a bug tacker for this, or do I use the MonoDevelop one.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > This decompiler shows promise but unfortunately it was not able to fully > decompile my .net 4.0 assemblies. > > Could see class and method names, but trying to view method contents > resulted in a Not Implemented exception . > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> > As you may be aware our old faithful reflector is no longer going to >> free. >> > >> http://www.red-gate.com/products/dotnet-development/reflector/announcement >> > I was wondering if their are any opensource alternatives. Or if their >> are >> > any projects being started to create one as a result of this >> announcement. >> >> MonoDevelop has integrated Cecil's Decompiler. >> >> The decompiler source is here: >> >> https://github.com/mono/cecil/tree/master/decompiler >> >> Someone could build a standalon Winforms or Gtk+ UI for this for >> dedicated decompilation of assemblies. >> >> Miguel. >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
