Robert Jordan wrote: > > On 07.11.2011 19:34, applepi wrote: >> >> >> I'd not seen mkbundle. I'll have to look into that as well.. this is >> going >> into proprietary code for a customer and I'm not as brushed up on how all >> of >> the GPL/LGPL restrictions affect that as I should be, so I'll have to dig >> into that somewhat. > > You should dig into that as soon as possible, because both > '--aot=full' and 'mkbundle --static' require that you code > is licensed under the LGPL. > >> What's the difference between --aot=full and mkbundle? --aot=full looked >> like it should produce a single binary as well.. > > Mkbundle does not AOT-compile. It's bundling the runtime together > with your assemblies and their dependencies into a fat binary. > > --aot=full is an experimental feature. > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >
This may end up being more of a problem than I thought. The customer is set pretty heavily in getting it to a fully native binary. I may need to explore other avenues. -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Using-mono-aot-aot-full-compilation-nothing-appears-to-happen-tp4010058p4013526.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
