On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 14:05 -0400, Abe Gillespie wrote: > All I can say is "GOOD LUCK!" DbLinq has long atrophied and after > spending many many hours trying to wrangle it myself, I ended just > buying Devart. Trust me, it pays for itself over the hours (and hours > and hours) of frustration it'll save. I would recommend Devart or an > alternative method for accessing your data and to steer far clear of > DbLinq.
+1 on steering clear of DBLinq. DBLinq was the straw-on-the-camel that finally pushed me to give up on C#/.NET for server-side [without a real Open Source platform I don't want to build stuff on it]. Really sad, because without a really good way to interface with databases... But nHibernate might be an option worth looking at. Someone told me that they work on Mono these days [unverified]. > Don't get me wrong, though. It was a very ambitious project and the > code is quite beautiful. But there are way too many edge cases that > aren't covered and you'll undoubtedly eventually run into one or more > of those issues.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
