I'm not sure if you mean "32-bit Qyoto for Mono" or "32-bit Qt" but it
makes no difference: 32-bit Qyoto is possible to build but it depends on 32-bit
Qt. I personally have no interest of putting any effort to it because I'm
convinced it is dead on arrival (32-bit binaries on OS X, as I've already
mentioned). I might be much more willing to help out with the 64-bit (or mixed)
Mono. I also think 64-bit Mono would lay the foundation for 64-bit MonoMac
which would be, in a way, more native as the underlying Cocoa is 64-bit.
________________________________
From: Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]>
To: Dimitar Dobrev <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Qyoto (C# binding for Qt) - Windows binaries
Oh, I had not seen it. Busy week.
I would live to see a 32 bit Qt for mono, if not we will have to sort out a 64
bit answer at some point, but the logistics, q&a and bindings make this very
complicated
Sent from my chubby iPhone 4S
On Oct 8, 2012, at 2:33 PM, Dimitar Dobrev <[email protected]> wrote:
Miguel,
>
> Just making sure you got my answerbecause I mailed it only to the lists,
>sorry about that.
>
>
> Regards,
> Dimitar
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]>
>To: Dimitar Dobrev <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]
>Sent: Friday, October 5, 2012 6:05 AM
>Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Qyoto (C# binding for Qt) - Windows binaries
>
>
>
>>A follow up to
>>http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Qyoto-C-binding-for-Qt-td4650740.html my
>>earlier announcement -
>>http://download.kde.org/stable/csharp-qt/4.0.7/win32/CSharpQt-Windows-4.0.7z.mirrorlist
>>you can now download Windows binaries of Qyoto .
>>
>>Any feedback is welcome.
>>
>
>
>These are fabulous news!
>
>
>Is Qyoto now actively maintained also on Linux and MacOS?
>
>
>Miguel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
