On 01.10.2013 15:16, [email protected] wrote:
On 1 Oct 2013, at 14:01, Robert Jordan <[email protected]> wrote:
mono_field_get_value_object is not mono_field_STATIC_get!
You are looking at the wrong function.
Sorry. I was trying to imply that, as in mono_field_get_value_object, that
mono_field_static_get_value should do its own vtable setup.
This looks like a bug.
I don't think this is a bug. mono_field_static_get/set and
mono_field_get/set behave pretty much the same: Both require
that the ctor was already invoked. The former requires
mono_runtime_class_init () whereas the latter needs
mono_runtime_object_init () or an explicit non-default ctor
invocation.
mono_field_get_value_object () is somewhat different because it
deals with both static and instance fields. It's more elaborated
(and slower), and serves different purposes (maybe it's used by
System.Reflection, I did't check).
Robert
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
