In terms of the "mono download", are you referring to a git clone? or the source tarball?
In terms of clone, I'd say it's valid to be there, they may not change often but it would be good to see the version history within that fork, rather than having to compare across mono and the fork. However, for the tarball, we could strip out the files that aren't required with some kind of clever script. On 21 November 2014 18:35, Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]> wrote: > Follow up. > > I am wondering if we should submodule the reference source, or just copy > the files? > > The module wont be updated frequently, and it is making the Mono download > a lot longer than it needs to be. > > Miguel > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Miguel de Icaza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> As promised, the plans: >> >> http://www.mono-project.com/docs/about-mono/dotnet-integration/ >> >> If you start work on something, please notify the list, and update the >> Trello board: >> >> https://trello.com/b/vRPTMfdz/net-framework-integration-into-mono >> >> Miguel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > >
_______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
