presumably memmove(3) does this, right? -----Original Message----- From: Serge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mono-list] cpblk?
> Dick convinced me to use memmove which works with overlapping regions. > (until someone can prove that it is a performance problem). I think that the point is to use fast block move instructions if available (say, MOVS on x86), especially in the cases where size=const. Hence non-overlapping behaviour in the specs. Sergey _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
