> is there some difference between Portable.NET and Mono? Both provides > .NET support, ilasm, csc, ... it's ok?
mono has a compiler written in c# Portable.net has it written in C. I also _think_ mono is more progressed, has expecially a better class lib, has a better name that does not remind me and the open source developers that hopefully use mono of Microsoft.net and does not invite Microsof to start trouble because of the .net in the name ;-) Johannes _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
