--- James Michael DuPont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > I wonder what the brazilian developers has to say > about this? > Mike
> --- "Eagle ( Brandon Holtsclaw )" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > here is close to the same thing in english i think > , > > dunno but it is an > > artical about mono and dotgnu > Its not the same. Here is the original text. > > <SNIP> > Padroniza��o > > A Microsoft submeteu no fim do ano 2000 o C# a um > �rg�o internacional de padroniza��o, o ECMA > (http://www.ecma.ch, > http://www.microsoft.com/NET/sharedsourcewp.asp). A > Sun fez algumas tentativas de padronizar o Java, mas > nenhum �rg�o internacional aceitou seus termos > (http://news.cnet.com/news/0,10000,0-1003-200-320974,00.html, > http://www.cnn.com/1999/TECH/computing/12/09/java.std.cancel.idg/). > O resultado � que o Java � uma linguagem > propriet�ria > enquanto o C# n�o �. > > Existem esfor�os para portar o C#/.NET para outras > plataformas, dos quais eu destacaria o Mono > (http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list), > PNet > (http://www.southern-storm.com.au/portable_net.html) > e > .NET para BSD Unix da Corel > (http://www3.corel.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=Corel/PressRelease/Details&id=CC100K16H9C). > </SNIP> > > <BABELFISH from=portugese to=english> > Standardization > The Microsoft submitted in the end of the year the > 2000 C # to an international agency of > standardization, the > ECMA (http://www.ecma.ch, > http://www.microsoft.com/NET/sharedsourcewp.asp). > > The Sun made some attempts to standardize the Java, > but no international agency accepted its terms > (http://news.cnet.com/news/0,10000,0-1003-200-320974,00.html, > http://www.cnn.com/1999/TECH/computing/12/09/java.std.cancel.idg/). > the result is that the Java is a language proprietor > while the C # is not. > > Efforts exist to carry the C#/.NET for other > platforms, of which I would detach the Mono > (http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list), > PNet > (http://www.southern-storm.com.au/portable_net.html) > and NET for BSD Unix of the Corel > (http://www3.corel.com/cgi-bin/gx.cgi/AppLogic+FTContentServer?pagename=Corel/PressRelease/Details&id=CC100K16H9C). > > </BABELFISH> > > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotnet/ht > > ml/deicazainterview.asp > > First, I'd like to say that the translation was good!! I always use English to Spanish translation because the portuguese isn't very complete, but I could see that in this case it was good! I liked very much the article! I keep talking with a friend that loves Java about the Standardization of C# and CLI. But he keeps saying that this is a MS play. I don't think so!! And I talk about the process Sun take with Java and the IBM answer. There is also the incident with Jakarta people where Sun changed some JCP aspects. I like the fact that C# and CLI was sent to a stardardization body. Because this allows what people are doing with Mono and Pnet. And I'm not even talking about other efforts like SharpDevelop, NAnt, NUnit, Npgsql :) and other projects that are being built on top of these technologies. This is very good. And I think that it can go even farther. I want to say that I *do* like Java. I like it very much and I think that it changed the history of computer programming. But I think also that C# is better, to me, and I want it to be even better. I don't know if I should ask this, but I didn't see anything about that anywhere. Java has Sun for stardards like Servlets, EJB, Transaction Processing and others. But I still didn't find standards like that for .Net, for example, transaction processing. I know there is COM+ and MTS, but what about Mono on Unix? Sorry if I'm talking too many nonsense things. Please let me know if I'm saying something wrong. ===== Regards, Francisco Jr. _______________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Encontros O lugar certo para voc� encontrar aquela pessoa que falta na sua vida. Cadastre-se hoje mesmo! http://br.encontros.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
