> In fact, the best and easiest solution for a stripped down version of mono > would be compatible to the compact framework (easier to port from > Compact.net to mono, a clear direction where development could go). > > I know, this is not a task for the next time, but if mono decides to take > it, compact.net compatiblity would be a good thing.
I forgot to mention: The compact Framework can't be very compact, as it has support for Windows.Forms, ADO.NET, ASP.NET, and of course the low-level classes. mor at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/device/compact.asp _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
