On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 01:41:14AM +0200, Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote:
> * [ Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:45:21 +0200 ]
> > Besides, the MS docs on the method > explicitly state that -1 is
> > supposed to be returned if Peek is called on a non-seekable stream.
>
> Mmm, strange, in the MS docs, they say under "Return Value":
>
> "The next character to be read, or -1 if no more characters are
> available or the stream does not support seeking"
>
> but under "Remarks":
>
> "The current position of the StreamReader is not changed by Peek. The
> returned value is -1 if no more characters are currently available."
>
> The behavior under remarks is the one i noticed, cause i run the same
> code under MS (wrapping a NetworkStream in a StreamReader) with no
> problem.
Those two statements are not mutually exclusive. They say:
push(read position)
if(stream supports seeking) {
if(more characters available) {
next char
} else {
-1
}
} else {
-1
}
pop(read position)
- Dick
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
