Miguel de Icaza wrote... > If people are really serious about implementing Windows.Forms despite the cons > of it, a lot of research has to go into understanding the most tricky parts of > Windows.Forms.
Would one option be not to implement the tricky parts? The best part of Windows.Forms is probably Visual Studio .NET's authoring tool, and I'm completely guessing that there's probably a small subset that's used 95% of the time. Does anyone know of any XML schemas for declarative (vs. programmatic) UI layout? -- Charles Wiltgen __________________________________________________________________________ In the San Diego area? Need world-class product management with expertise in streaming, wireless, games and .NET? <http://wiltgen.net/cv/> _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
