Hi Miguel,
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 07:25, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> It is just syntactic sugar for a common construct.
Sure :-) my complaint is ultimately one about the language, such that
while there is a way of dealing with method pointers generically, it's
not made syntactically easy - probably (as Ben says) due to the (not
insurmountable) problems of method overloading.
Anyway, it seems unfixable to me; there's no way we can do things like:
gobject.connect ("foo", obj.method);
We're going to have to do new FooBarBaz (obj.method) instead.
Regards,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
