On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 16:41, Dick Porter wrote: > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 15:25, Richard Torkar wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 11:09, Dick Porter wrote: > > > Wouldnt it be easier (and more deterministic) to pick which argument > > > style to use based on the c# equivalent of argv[0]? > > > > > > > Wouldn't that then break the default csc behaviour? > > I know some project depend on that, e.g. Eclipse's C-sharp plugin. > > The idea is that if the binary is called "csc", it speaks csc (ie /blah) > options, and if its called "mcs" it does sensible options. Then to get > csc behaviour we just install a link to mcs under the csc name. >
I misunderstood you completely :) My bad english... Well, anyway, that sounds a lot smarter and cleaner. /Richard -- Supporting the Mono project, and helping you... http://mono.baselabs.org http://mono.baselabs.org/CSAM *** *** "First steps" building guides, CSAM the C Sharp Archived Modules daily Mono RPMS, C# tutorial,... _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
