What proportion of the code for the reimplemented WxWindows would be unique to each toolkit (e.g. MS Windows, GTK+, Xlib, Motif, Carbon)?
My concern would be that instead of creating two libraries, one that maps C# to C another layer that maps C to C++, you're going to have a C# to C library for MS Windows, another for GTK+, another for Xlib, etc. On Tuesday 16 July 2002 11:12 pm, you wrote: > This is why I think reimplementing wxWindows would be better. It would > also not add additional requirements. It would compile against > something the user should have (GTK+, Xlib, Motif, Aqua, Carbon, etc.) > Of course, this runs into the problem of having to maintain the code > changes wxWindows has. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
