On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 04:55, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> This patch is actually incorrect, because it is not valid to take the
> address of a constant, so this code should emit the corresponding error
> instead of silently generating incorrect code.

I'll fix it on Monday once I've found out the corresponding csc error
code.

Andrew


_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

Reply via email to