On 25 Sep 2002, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > some "bits" like the IIOP encoding, but it is doubtful how useful that
> > > really is.
> > >
> > > The in-proc features are cool, but it would need things to be
> > > implemented with the ORBit model in mind, and not with a C# mind set.
When it comes to the ORBit model, cant we just create a single generic C
function that calls into Mono to the C# method we want to call?
> >
> > How else would we acomplish binding of bonobo objects?
>
> There are two ways of integrating with Bonobo:
>
> * At the binding level, just be a user, and not an
> implementor: Use Gtk# to produce the binding
Yucky. :)
That would kinda make Mono apps a second class citizen?
I thaught we wanted to use Mono to help develop Gnome apps easier.
>
> * At the interface-level, a pure Bonobo# implementation
> would have to implement the Bonobo interfaces and a set of
> the helper functions.
Sounds like a lot of work, but would be better in the end.
Bob
>
> Miguel.
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
