hello! > I'm curious, why are you going for a GtkHtml implementation? I would > have thought that a simple DHTML/CSS implementation would be much > simpler, more portable and have the added benefit that the docs > go-mono.com web page would be identical to those in the distribution. It > seems a little over the top to be implementing a documentation browser > when all you're doing is displaying web pages. Of course, search may be > a little tricky ;-)
Oh, do not get me wrong. GtkHTML is just a lightweight HTML rendering engine that does not support CSS, so we need it to look decent for those of us that will be using the documentation in our day-to-day work on Linux. The Web-based interfaces lack the agility that you get from a native GUI tool to browse your documentation. I have no problems if we take later the scripts and generate a full documentation set that is web-browsable (in fact, it might just be part of the process), but we need a command-line and GUI tools that we can use natively on Linux when disconnected from the Web (and that has better interactions than a web page). Miguel _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
