BTW, speaking of benchmarks, I updated my 3D benchmark: http://mono.eurosoft.od.ua/files/Gfx_NET.tar.gz
Now it includes "Null" driver to make it possible to run it on Linux. In fact there was XLib-based driver but unfortunatelly I've lost that code by accident ;-( Hint: porting this code to GTK# would be great. This would require creating GTK-backed IDriver implementation. Sergey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Mettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Guenther Roith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:59 AM Subject: Re: [Mono-list] tiny benchmark of current mono clr, java clr, ms clr > re all, > > On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Guenther Roith wrote: > > You shouldn't print anything to the console, because this tests how fast > > your os can scroll the terninal window. > > Do somehthing else like only counting. > > well, it's certainly affected by, but obviously this tiny bench > does not solely measure the performance of the terminal/console > and its scrolling. else the measured differences (most of them > being significant at a confidence level of 95%) between the > runtime environments of the same os platform could not be > explained. > > the bench could be much better of course :) admittedly, i did not > take the time to write a nice, more or less representative > benchmark (which is a difficult "political" task btw). but this > was not the goal anyway. i just wanted to quickly compare the > relative performance of the runtime environments for that > particular task. there is no claim for representation or > generalization at all. and i did not want to compare linux vs. > windows either (perhaps the second point in the conclusions is > misleading, i think i should remove it). > > nevertheless i was surprised by some of the results. regardless > of the influence of the terminal performance itself i expected a > "home run" of the ms clr on windows. but mono appears to be > significantly faster (in the context of this specific task). as > well, i did not expect mono to beat java on windows (dito). i do > not know the reason for this however (perhaps you know?). > > another thing which surprised me were the quite different cil > file sizes generated with the mono and ms compiler respectively. > i did not further analyze this though. > > regards > > dan > > -- > ...::: Daniel Mettler | http://www.numlock.ch :::.... > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
