Hello, > For the sake of the non-GNOME people on the list, the exact same > brouhaha happened with GNOME. What eventually happened after the uproar > died down was, as Adam suggests here, a division of the list into > gnome-hackers and gnome-private. gnome-hackers continued on as a "core > development" list[1], and gnome-private faded into the background, > playing the role of ultimate puppet master, waiting for the day to > announce to the world that yes, it does INDEED have a doomsday device, > and is not afraid to use it. > > Okay, I made that last bit up. But the point remains that such a > division is entirely workable, and Miguel has already been through a > similar one, and I'm sure he will handle the current situation just as > reasonably.
In fact, when I made mono-hackers and there was a debate a year ago, I promised to create a new mailing list (maybe mono-devel-list) which I failed to do due to work overload. The right solution is to create mono-devel-list, I will ask for the list to be created, but I am going to Mexico tomorrow morning, and wont have time to set it up until Thursday. Juli has given a good description of why a private mailing list is required for an inner group. Best wishes, Miguel. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
