Author: lluis
Date: 2005-04-27 07:17:57 -0400 (Wed, 27 Apr 2005)
New Revision: 43648
Modified:
trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ChangeLog
trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ContextsTest.cs
trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/RemotingServicesTest.cs
Log:
2005-04-27 Lluis Sanchez Gual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* RemotingServicesTest.cs: Fix warning.
* ContextsTest.cs: Removed unneeded exception catch.
Changed the order in which GetEnvoySink is called. I think
this is a safe chenge, since it is not defined where the
call to GetEnvoySink should be made.
Modified: trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ChangeLog 2005-04-27
10:09:32 UTC (rev 43647)
+++ trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ChangeLog 2005-04-27
11:17:57 UTC (rev 43648)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2005-04-27 Lluis Sanchez Gual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * RemotingServicesTest.cs: Fix warning.
+ * ContextsTest.cs: Removed unneeded exception catch.
+ Changed the order in which GetEnvoySink is called. I think
+ this is a safe chenge, since it is not defined where the
+ call to GetEnvoySink should be made.
+
2005-02-16 Lluis Sanchez Gual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* HttpCalls.cs, TcpCalls.cs: Don't use a hardcoded port number for the
Modified: trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ContextsTest.cs
===================================================================
--- trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ContextsTest.cs
2005-04-27 10:09:32 UTC (rev 43647)
+++ trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/ContextsTest.cs
2005-04-27 11:17:57 UTC (rev 43648)
@@ -59,8 +59,6 @@
[Test]
public void TestNewContext ()
{
- try
- {
CallSeq.Init("TestNewContext");
CallSeq.Add (">> TestNewContext");
object[] at = new object[] { new ContextHookAttribute
("1",true)};
@@ -70,11 +68,6 @@
RunTestObject (list);
CallSeq.Add ("<< TestNewContext");
CallSeq.Check (Checks.seqNewContext,1);
- }
- catch (Exception eX)
- {
- Console.WriteLine (eX);
- }
}
[Test]
@@ -299,10 +292,18 @@
"011 (d1,c1)
IContributeServerContextSink(x.d1).GetServerContextSink",
"012 (d1,c1)
IContributeServerContextSink(1.d1).GetServerContextSink",
"013 (d1,c1) --> ServerContextSink(1.d1)
SyncProcessMessage .ctor",
- "014 (d1,c1) --> ServerContextSink(x.d1)
SyncProcessMessage .ctor",
- "015 (d1,c1) List created",
+ "014 (d1,c1) --> ServerContextSink(x.d1)
SyncProcessMessage .ctor",
+
+ // Changed the order. I think this is a safe
chenge, since it is
+ // not defined where the call to GetEnvoySink
should be made.
+ "015 (d1,c1)
IContributeEnvoySink(1.d1).GetEnvoySink",
+ "016 (d1,c1)
IContributeEnvoySink(x.d1).GetEnvoySink",
+ "017 (d1,c1) List created",
+
+/* "015 (d1,c1) List created",
"016 (d1,c1)
IContributeEnvoySink(1.d1).GetEnvoySink",
"017 (d1,c1)
IContributeEnvoySink(x.d1).GetEnvoySink",
+*/
"018 (d1,c1) <-- ServerContextSink(x.d1)
SyncProcessMessage .ctor",
"019 (d1,c1) <-- ServerContextSink(1.d1)
SyncProcessMessage .ctor",
"020 (d1,c0) <-> global DynamicSink Finish
.ctor client:True",
Modified: trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/RemotingServicesTest.cs
===================================================================
--- trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/RemotingServicesTest.cs
2005-04-27 10:09:32 UTC (rev 43647)
+++ trunk/mcs/class/System.Runtime.Remoting/Test/RemotingServicesTest.cs
2005-04-27 11:17:57 UTC (rev 43648)
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@
Assert("#A06",
RemotingServices.GetObjectUri(objMarshal) == null);
- ObjRef objRef = RemotingServices.Marshal(objMarshal);
+ RemotingServices.Marshal(objMarshal);
Assert("#A07",
RemotingServices.GetObjectUri(objMarshal) != null);
// TODO: uncomment when RemotingServices.Disconnect is
implemented
_______________________________________________
Mono-patches maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-patches
