Hi, On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 13:32 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > Neither am I a C# or VB.NET programmer (in the remotest sense) nor am > > I am compiler guru. I am making these observations as a practitioner > > and as someone who spared some sincere love over mbas/bmcs.
> I do have another concern though; Today folks are reporting that VB > does not work (and in a sense that is correct, we do not even have full > runtime support). > > I think I might want to move mbas, mbas2, bmcs and the VisualStudio > runtime *out* of mcs and not distribute it as part of mono/mcs until > they are ready. The runtime in particular is missing enough pieces > (from 2.0, but the issue comes up frequently) that I much rather just > state that we do not support VB.NEt for the time being. That sounds like a good idea. I do think it is important to keep the run-time support separate from the compiler like is done for version 1.0 and 1.1 of the .NET framework. I think there is more interest in getting VB.NET apps to run on Mono than the ability to be able to compile VB.NET apps using mono. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mono-vb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-vb
