I think this is different look on portability. SharpDevelop is really
cool becasuse bring all power and native look of windows UI, same as
MonoDevelop brings all power of Gnome UI. This is for me the problem of
Java IDEs like NetBeans - they stay somewhere in the middle of all
systems and they are nowhere at home. I want IDE fully integreated with
the desktop where I code.
For me is necesary that I can write applications binded to the specific
system but also write applications that is fully portable - with one
framework. Mono rulez!
Marko Zmak wrote:
I agree with you Miguel, although the practical portability of any
system or language does depend on portability of it's developement
tools. For me, portability isn't complete if I have to use one IDE to
write a program in Windows, and then use another (and thus adapt some
parts of the program) on Linux.
But, I agree that people should stop confusing M and MD.
Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Mono != MonoDevelop, you should stop confusing those.
There are *many* Gnome specific applications for Linux built with Mono,
and that has *nothing* to do with Mono's own portability.
--
__________________________________________________________
Pavel Bánský
levap at bansky.net I write code...
__________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Mono-winforms-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-winforms-list
