Ludovic Brenta wrote: > I too prefer to stick with the 1.0 format; 3.0 (quilt) interferes with > my normal workflow of checking out a branch that contains the "debian" > subdirectory.
Yes, I do feel like "3.0 (quilt)" tries to advance the patch and upload workflow at the cost of increased work for packaging new upstream releases. One compromise would be to adopt the 3.0 format, but keep the quilt patching logic. I note the Debian URL says the patching logic "should" be removed, but I think we understand why they say that and why we know it's a bad idea. Note, I did update monotone-viz to use the 3.0 format but keeping the quilt logic but reverted it because I was worried about dpkg versions. However, I'm now convinced that the build machines are up to date enough to not have issues due to dpkg-applied patching and quilt-applied patching. Francis _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
