Richard Levitte writes: > About usher, my thoughts is to package it alone, and to have a second > package, let's say we'd call it monotone-server-usher, that could be > set up to serve a number of databases... I guess > monotone-server-usher would naturally conflict with monotone-server...
I think this would be a great idea but it is unfortunately too late to have a new package in Squeeze. So, I think you should package usher for experimental together with monotone 0.99.1. Also, please pay particular attention to the combined configuration of usher and monotone. Ideally it should work out of the box with a reasonable default; failing that a couple of debconf questions might be necessary. I suggest you use branch org.debian.monotone-server-usher. After usher, it might be a good idea to consider a more complete solution that wraps monotone in a nice web front-end such as trac or indefero. -- Ludovic Brenta. _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
