Francis Russell <[email protected]> writes: > Ludovic Brenta wrote: > >> Not anymore; see my earlier mail with a strange subject (copy/paste >> error, sorry for that). The two active branches are now >> org.debian.monotone (uploads of 0.48 to unstable) and >> org.debian.monotone.for-mtn-1.0 (uploads of upcoming 1.0 to >> experimental). >> >> Do you feel that uploading 0.99.1 to experimental is necessary? >> > > OK, my point was that org.debian.monotone is already on 0.99.1 so I > assumed any 0.48 related uploads would exist on the > org.debian.monotone.squeeze branch. IIRC, the changelog editor was one > of the main reasons for there being a 0.99 at all. I was hoping that > 0.99 might get exposed to a wider audience before it gets committed in > stone.
I agree that it would have been nice to have 0.99.1 in Debian Squeeze but this is not going to happen. Given that 0.99 has incompatibilities with both 0.48 (database schema and the URI parsing) and 1.0 (database schema again), I'd vote for skipping 0.99.1 and providing 1.0 whenever it comes out, which seems to be any day now (?). Pursuant to the new branching policy (which I admit I decided on my own, like a dictator), I have suspended the head of org.debian.monotone that was on 0.99.1, keeping only the one that is on 0.48-4. If you really want me to upload 0.99.1 to experimental and think the packaging is ready, please say so; I'll make a new branch org.debian.monotone.experimental starting from c0559b95cce0140975e6655c4ab27a9e04df0abb and upload. -- Ludovic Brenta. _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
