On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 08:49:06AM -0600, Derek Scherger wrote: > > Though I guess the semantics of listing a directory are not totally > > clear; if I say 'log foo/', and there's a file foo/bar that used to be > > in some other dir, should the log include edits to foo/bar before it > > was in this dir? if there used to be a file called foo/bar but is no > > longer, should the log include edits to foo/bar when it was in this > > dir? > > part of me thinks we should list the rename but not bother tracing back > beyond that point. if that is the file you're interested in, you can ask > for a log from the rename revision using the old name to keep going.
Yeah, having though about it I think it is clear enough, just a little subtle. Since it means that "log dir/" and "log `find dir -type f`" are rather different in effect. -- Nathaniel -- Details are all that matters; God dwells there, and you never get to see Him if you don't struggle to get them right. -- Stephen Jay Gould _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
