On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0400, Joel Reed wrote: > A few questions: > > 1) functionality look ok?
Yep. > 2) --depth as param name ok? I'm dubious. It's pretty confusing if --depth sometimes refers to the ancestry graph, and sometimes refers to the filesystem layout. It's especially bad, since 'log' presumably takes _both_ switches... (Switching to --maxdepth doesn't really help, now we have two options that are arbitrarily different; reminds me of tla's "mv" vs. "move"...). Not sure what a better name would be. We can change the name of log's --depth option to something else, and let --depth refer to the filesystem, if that turns out to allow a nicer solution. -- Nathaniel -- "...All of this suggests that if we wished to find a modern-day model for British and American speech of the late eighteenth century, we could probably do no better than Yosemite Sam." This email may be read aloud. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
