At 2005-07-27T14:57:48-0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Of course, we don't compile on VC++ at all ATM, so I'm not sure how
> problematic this is :-).
And if or when we do, it's likely to be VC++ 7.1 upwards--the surgery
required to work with VC++ 6.0 would probably be quite ugly. VC++ 6.0
is officially unsupported by Microsoft (or is soon to be), and has
roughly the same level of C++ standards compliance as a Perl
interpreter. ;-)
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
/| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
