On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:01:50AM -0700, Eric Anderson wrote: > It would appear that the version that did &string[0] to get a > writeable pointer to the string was the version that was committed. > Was this intentional? Clemens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) was > concerned that doing this wasn't safe under the STL spec (although it > works in practice because of how strings are implemented). > > I send a second version (Subject: [Monotone-devel] Incremental binary > test, try 2) which instead used a char array[size], and changed the > signature of guess_binary in file.hh.
Taking another look now, I see the same attachment in both messages. Could you resend the second diff? Cheers, Matt _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
