Thomas Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> Actually. you and Nathaniel are right: the certificates I would like > to use make a statement about a specific revision of a file. As > there is no notion of a revision of a file (only revision of a > tree), it does not seem right to me to use the existing certificates > for my purpose -- although technically possible. Yes, you just get revisions of a tree, and blobs of data, and each revision has a manifest, and each manifest maps a filename to a blob of data. So that doesn't really let you talk about a version of a file without giving a revision of a tree as well. But I'd have though that's OK: almost all of the cases I can think of for commenting on a file would be in the context of the rest of the tree anyway. For example, that README has been checked, and is suitable for the release. For that kind of case, I can imagine you'd want some shortcuts, so you could fix INSTALL, but keep README as being approved, but you could have scripts and things to do that. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
