Christof Petig schrieb: > Last I looked tailor did have shortcomings compared to cvssync for this > specific task (CVS-monotone synchronization) and seemed rather difficult > to set up, so I stayed with what I had already achieved. I can not > comment on the current situation, though.
Quoting tailor's web site: > Other Notes > > [...] A two-way sync with CVS also works. It uses two local copies of the > working directory. > > LeleGaifax suggested an alternative plan that uses four (!) local copies of > the code: [...] This does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling about the ease of use of tailor. I like to get proven wrong here. Christof
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
