On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Christof Petig wrote: > Hi Nathaniel, > > I decided to propose merging cvssync in small pieces: > - Win32 pipe abstraction > - cvs_import and cvssync diff apply code (yet to factor out so that both > share the same code,I need to contact Graydon about this) [that's > index_deltatext(), struct piece etc., most probably this will mandate a > sane scope for the global_pieces variable (rcs_import.cc:307)] > - anything ready by then
Hmm, I'm just not clear why you suggest this? My general preference is not to have dead code sitting around mainline, and since none of these changes are useful until they all go in... what is gained by doing this complicated piecewise landing over just getting the branch all in shape and merging it all at once? -- Nathaniel -- "...these, like all words, have single, decontextualized meanings: everyone knows what each of these words means, everyone knows what constitutes an instance of each of their referents. Language is fixed. Meaning is certain. Santa Claus comes down the chimney at midnight on December 24." -- The Language War, Robin Lakoff _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
