Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> We can already do replication across multiple hosts, that are > heterogenous in any way I can think of, and the replication is > secure against tampering, man-in-the-middle, and so on -- it's just > that people could peak at the data while it goes by. In which case the problems with keys and certificates doesn't have to be relevant; doesn't TLS have anonymous cipher suites, which can be used without either end authenticating (and without either having a certificate)? In which case that could be used just as an encrypting wrapper, and the existing monotone protocol can continue to do all the authentication. So then we're back to TLS libraries not doing asynchronous I/O (and not being very convenient to use, which I go along with). I'm reasonably sure GNU TLS is intended to support non-blocking I/O; it surely can't be *that* hard to fix it, if the I/O turns out not to be quite complete? _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
