On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 00:15 -0700, Emile Snyder wrote: > Hi all, > > Do people think that an h:branch selector to find the heads of a branch > should accept globbing wildcard characters like the b: selector? So if > you said
Ok, no one argued against it, there were a couple of lukewarm "might be useful", and it preserves consistency. I'm gonna go ahead and check it in; if anyone feels it's the wrong choice it's easy to turn off. > erase_ancestors(b:*) > or > union (erase_ancestors(b:b1), erase_ancestors(b:b2), ...) This seems like a thornier question. I still feel like the union() one follows the least surprise principle better. If anyone feels like the ambiguity of which it will do makes either answer surprising, we can turn it (globbing the h: value) off. Thanks all, -emile
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
