"Matthew A. Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> If there was a monotone patch command, it could handle all of the > renaming and stuff on it's own. Just wanted to get some thoughts on > this. Comprehending and applying diffs seems a bit hairy to me, but maybe monotone has to do that anyway. For Unix (and for experimenting), maybe it would be moderately easy to take a monotone diff and split it into a stream of patches to individual files, renames, and adds/drops, in such a way that the patches can be fed directly to patch(1)? I think that would be useful. I'm less sure about building it in to monotone; my guess is that would end up as an lua hook which'll end up just calling "patch" anyway. Don't know about Windows, though. _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
