Daniel Carosone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
> 4a) has a special 'branch completed' cert on the child (propagate) > node (or on the head? I think i prefer it on the "merge back" > result as a better conceptual model). I think it's easier if this special cert is always on what would otherwise be the head, even if that's not perfect. > 4b) has a special 'branch abandoned' cert on the head, for branches > that are development dead ends? That seems useful. In particular, the same thing might offer a way to kill a head that you no longer want in a live branch. [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
