Vinzenz 'evilissimo' Feenstra wrote:
> I've tested the modifications now and corrected them. The source
> compiles fine now.
> So this should be the final diff for it :)

What a mess ...

If I compare the patch to the subject of this thread I feel a bit sick.

While Nathaniel stated that std::string, CoW and % are ok with him, you
rewrote your patch to use non-typesafe VA_ARGS using execute/fetch
variants. I hope that you did not invest too much time into this
modifications.

I really liked to be able to remove .c_str() from the query parameter on
several calls because I dumped VA_ARGS.

And this misunderstanding/debate actually prevents sqlite3.binary from
being included IIRC.

Sigh
   Christof

I would vote for your original % (and std::string ?) based approach.
Should I take the time and (ab)use your patches to my liking? Perhaps we
should sort this out first.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Monotone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel

Reply via email to