In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:25:27 +1100, Daniel Carosone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dan> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: dan> > Yeah, the only problem, as far as I see it, is that approve takes dan> > --branch, so for example, I could very easily say something like: dan> > dan> > monotone approve --branch=net.venge.monotone.approved.linux \ dan> > 6e87084a87413eed2c31100054ff8d5045f0be4d dan> > dan> > If that gets repeated a few, do you know what kind of graph that dan> > branch (which I invented on the spot) would have? dan> dan> There's nothing whatsoever intrinsically wrong with a dan> disconnected branch, so long as the users of that branch have dan> appropriate expectations. I did a little bit of experiment, and found out that I had misunderstood what the heads of a branch with a disconnected graph would be. That was basically my worry with this scheme. My mantra for the night: experiment a little first, ask questions later. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
