In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:29:36 -0400, Ethan Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
eblanton> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker spake unto us the following wisdom: eblanton> > So your listening server would basically be a proxy that eblanton> > sends bit back and forth between a remote client and a eblanton> > local master server process. In what way does that give eblanton> > you extra security? eblanton> eblanton> No, not at all like that. I would rather, as the previous eblanton> poster suggested, usher received the incoming data, and eblanton> rather than spawning the monotone server directly (as it eblanton> does now), it requested a privileged process to spawn the eblanton> monotone server on its behalf and then communicated with eblanton> that server. Ah, I missed that other post. That makes a lot more sense. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
