In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:13:48 +0100, Bruce Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
monotone> <http://willowbend.cx/2006/06/19/subversion-update-command-considered-harmful/> monotone> monotone> I'm not quite sure what it's saying, except that review is monotone> important, and that CVS and subversion don't make it so monotone> easy. I'm not sure why he argues that that makes git monotone> better. To me, it connects with what is suggest in the monotone manual, commit-then-update-and-maybe-merge. Other than that, I think the classic thing, to have the diffs of each new change sent to a mailing list works well for review. monotone> But anyway, it's another vote for the importance of workflow monotone> support, I suppose. Agreed. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
