Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There have been many requests for peeking of all sorts, like to know > what you would get from a server if you pulled, or what you would send > during a push, or what files would be changed/dropped/renamed by an > update, or... > > To cover all those cases, would it be a very bad idea to have a > --dryrun option that a selection of commands would understand and > respect? In some cases, it could work well with a few well written > hooks.
I believe that was the intention, yes. Hmm, I thought the idea was described in the wiki, but I don't see it. Anyway, my impression was that Nathaniel et alles were thinking exactly along the lines of a --dryrun (or some other suitable flag) as you describe. [...] _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
