On Thursday 17 August 2006 13:34, Thomas Keller wrote: > Well, I think I once thought about such a possibility myself and > wondered if the introduction of "local" branches would be useful [...]
Real local/private branches would imho be really usefull in that they would allow to commit partial stuff without immediately sharing that with the rest of the world. > I'm unsure if "real" subbranches, branches which are only visible if a > user is inside a parent branch, can be implemented in any nice way, > since I think this would bring in more complexity (code wise and user > wise) than it would solve. For merging anything from such private branch back to mainline, something similar to the pluck functionality would be needed, otherwise 'private' revisions would have to become public at that time. Thomas M. -- Thomas Moschny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
